Which reasoning approach involves comparing two similar situations to draw conclusions?

The reasoning approach that involves comparing two similar situations to draw conclusions is known as analogical reasoning. This method works by identifying similarities between two scenarios and inferring that if they are alike in specific ways, they may also be alike in other aspects. For instance, if two different legal cases have similar circumstances and outcomes, one may use analogical reasoning to argue that the same principles should apply to a new but analogous case.

This type of reasoning is particularly valuable in persuasive speaking and argumentation, as it helps the speaker illustrate their point by providing relatable examples that the audience can understand. By drawing parallels between two situations, the speaker can effectively support their claims, enhance comprehension, and bolster the argument's persuasive power.